↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of Nature Contact for Children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Planning Literature, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 259)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
1040 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Benefits of Nature Contact for Children
Published in
Journal of Planning Literature, July 2015
DOI 10.1177/0885412215595441
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,040 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 1031 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 190 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 11%
Student > Bachelor 82 8%
Researcher 78 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 4%
Other 140 13%
Unknown 399 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 169 16%
Environmental Science 106 10%
Psychology 62 6%
Arts and Humanities 47 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 4%
Other 181 17%
Unknown 435 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2026.
All research outputs
#316,606
of 34,436,843 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Planning Literature
#7
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,762
of 298,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Planning Literature
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,436,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them