↓ Skip to main content

Models of macromolecular crowding effects and the need for quantitative comparisons with experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Structural Biology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Models of macromolecular crowding effects and the need for quantitative comparisons with experiment
Published in
Current Opinion in Structural Biology, February 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.01.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
Japan 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 273 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 29%
Researcher 73 24%
Student > Master 31 10%
Professor 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 40 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 30%
Chemistry 63 21%
Physics and Astronomy 35 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 9%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 47 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Structural Biology
#1,023
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,560
of 102,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Structural Biology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.