↓ Skip to main content

A centralized cardiovascular risk service to improve guideline adherence in private primary care offices

Overview of attention for article published in Contemporary Clinical Trials, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A centralized cardiovascular risk service to improve guideline adherence in private primary care offices
Published in
Contemporary Clinical Trials, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2015.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Many large health systems now employ clinical pharmacists in team-based care to assist patients and physicians with management of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. However, small private offices often lack the resources to hire a clinical pharmacist for their office. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a centralized, web-based CV risk service (CVRS) managed by clinical pharmacists will improve guideline adherence in primary care medical offices in rural and small communities. This study is a cluster randomized prospective trial in 12 primary care offices. Medical offices were randomized to either the CVRS intervention or usual care. The intervention will last for 12months and all subjects will have research visits at baseline and 12months. Primary outcomes will include adherence to treatment guidelines and control of key CV risk factors. Data will also be abstracted from the medical record at 30months to determine if the intervention effect is sustained after it is discontinued. This study will enroll subjects through 2015 and results will be available in 2018. This study will provide information on whether a distant, centralized CV risk service can improve guideline adherence in medical offices that lack the resources to employ clinical pharmacists.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 213 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 78 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 8%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 79 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,545,639
of 28,815,917 outputs
Outputs from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#495
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,835
of 283,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contemporary Clinical Trials
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,815,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.