Thioredoxin participates in thiol-disulfide exchange reactions and both oxidized thioredoxin (disulfide form) and reduced thioredoxin (dithiol form) are found under physiological conditions. Previous structural studies suggested that the two forms were extremely similar, although significant functional and spectroscopic differences exist. We therefore undertook high-resolution solution structural studies of the two forms of Escherichia coli thioredoxin in order to detect subtle conformational differences.
The solution structures of reduced and oxidized thioredoxin are extremely similar. Backbone structure is largely identical in the two forms, with slight differences in the region of the active site, which includes Cys32 and Cys35. The side chain sulfur atom of Cys32 is tilted away from that of Cys35 in the reduced form of the protein to accommodate the increase in S-S distance that occurs upon reduction of the disulfide, but the chi 1 angles of the two cysteines remain the same in the two forms.
Only subtle conformational changes occur upon changing the oxidation state of the active site cysteines, including the positions of some side chains and in hydrogen bonding patterns in the active site region. Functional differences between the two forms are probably therefore related to differences in local conformational flexibility in and near the active site loop.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2017.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Structure
#1,984
of 3,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,654
of 23,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Structure
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
