↓ Skip to main content

SOD2 targeted gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 yields Human cells devoid of MnSOD

Overview of attention for article published in Free Radical Biology & Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SOD2 targeted gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 yields Human cells devoid of MnSOD
Published in
Free Radical Biology & Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.07.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To date no models exist to study MnSOD deficiency in human cells. To address this deficiency, we created a SOD2-null human cell line that is completely devoid of detectable MnSOD protein expression and enzyme activity. We utilized the CRISPR/Cas9 system to generate biallelic SOD2 disruption in HEK293T cells. These SOD2-null cells exhibit impaired clonogenic activity, which was rescued by either treatment with GC4419, a pharmacological small-molecule mimic of SOD, or growth in hypoxia. The phenotype of these cells is primarily characterized by impaired mitochondrial bioenergetics. The SOD2-null cells displayed perturbations in their mitochondrial ultrastructure and preferred glycolysis as opposed to oxidative phosphorylation to generate ATP. The activities of mitochondrial complex I and II were both significantly impaired by the absence of MnSOD activity, presumably from disruption of the Fe/S centers in NADH dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase subunit B by the aberrant redox state in the mitochondrial matrix of SOD2-null cells. By creating this model we provide a novel tool with which to study the consequences of lack of MnSOD activity in human cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 22%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Chemistry 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,249,621
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#766
of 6,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,602
of 299,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.