↓ Skip to main content

The role of dyking and fault control in the rapid onset of eruption at Chaitén volcano, Chile

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of dyking and fault control in the rapid onset of eruption at Chaitén volcano, Chile
Published in
Nature, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nature10541
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Wicks, Juan Carlos de la Llera, Luis E. Lara, Jacob Lowenstern

Abstract

Rhyolite is the most viscous of liquid magmas, so it was surprising that on 2 May 2008 at Chaitén Volcano, located in Chile's southern Andean volcanic zone, rhyolitic magma migrated from more than 5 km depth in less than 4 hours (ref. 1) and erupted explosively with only two days of detected precursory seismic activity. The last major rhyolite eruption before that at Chaitén was the largest volcanic eruption in the twentieth century, at Novarupta volcano, Alaska, in 1912. Because of the historically rare and explosive nature of rhyolite eruptions and because of the surprisingly short warning before the eruption of the Chaitén volcano, any information about the workings of the magmatic system at Chaitén, and rhyolitic systems in general, is important from both the scientific and hazard perspectives. Here we present surface deformation data related to the Chaitén eruption based on radar interferometry observations from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) DAICHI (ALOS) satellite. The data on this explosive rhyolite eruption indicate that the rapid ascent of rhyolite occurred through dyking and that melt segregation and magma storage were controlled by existing faults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 116 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 32%
Researcher 32 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 101 80%
Engineering 4 3%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#13,356,164
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#81,733
of 90,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,402
of 139,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#797
of 954 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 954 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.