↓ Skip to main content

What Effects Might Exenatide have on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Parkinson's Disease, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What Effects Might Exenatide have on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis
Published in
Journal of Parkinson's Disease, January 2018
DOI 10.3233/jpd-181329
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exenatide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that was recently studied for potential disease-modifying effects in a randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with moderate stage Parkinson's disease, and showed positive effects on the motor severity of the disease which were sustained 12 weeks beyond the period of exenatide exposure. Analysis of pre-defined secondary outcomes revealed no statistically significant differences between patients treated with exenatide in total non-motor symptom burden and overall quality of life measures. However, the response of individual non-motor symptoms to an intervention may vary and thus this post hoc analysis was conducted to explore the possible effects of exenatide compared to placebo on individual non-motor symptoms. Compared to placebo, patients treated with exenatide-once weekly had greater improvements in individual domains assessing mood/depression across all observer-rated outcome measures after 48 weeks including the "mood/apathy" domain of the NMSS, -3.3points (95% CI -6.2, -0.4), p = 0.026; the "mood" score (Q1.3+Q1.4 of the MDS-UPDRS Part 1), -0.3points (95% CI -0.6, -0.1), p = 0.034; and a trend in the MADRS total score, -1.7points (95% CI -3.6, 0.2), p = 0.071. In addition, there was an improvement in the "emotional well-being" domain of the PDQ-39 of 5.7 points ((95% CI -11.3, -0.1), p = 0.047 though these improvements were not sustained 12 weeks after exenatide withdrawal. At 48 weeks these changes were of a magnitude that would be subjectively meaningful to patients and were not associated with changes in motor severity or other factors, suggesting exenatide may exert independent effects on mood dysfunction. These exploratory findings will contribute to the design of future trials to confirm the extent of motor and non-motor symptom effects of exenatide in larger cohorts of patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 11%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 51 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 16%
Neuroscience 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 55 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,171,622
of 33,732,945 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Parkinson's Disease
#98
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,591
of 494,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Parkinson's Disease
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,732,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.