↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012
Authors

Paola Passalacqua, Patrick Belmont, Dennis M. Staley, Jeffrey D. Simley, J Ramon Arrowsmith, Collin A. Bode, Christopher Crosby, Stephen B. DeLong, Nancy F. Glenn, Sara A. Kelly, Dimitri Lague, Harish Sangireddy, Keelin Schaffrath, David G. Tarboton, Thad Wasklewicz, Joseph M. Wheaton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 373 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 25%
Student > Master 63 16%
Researcher 60 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 66 17%
Unknown 62 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 157 41%
Environmental Science 68 18%
Engineering 33 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Computer Science 5 1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 98 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#1,338
of 1,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,553
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.