↓ Skip to main content

Efficient expression of stabilized mRNA PEG-peptide polyplexes in liver

Overview of attention for article published in Gene Therapy, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Efficient expression of stabilized mRNA PEG-peptide polyplexes in liver
Published in
Gene Therapy, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/gt.2015.68
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The expression efficiency in liver following hydrodynamic delivery of in vitro transcribed mRNA was improved 2000-fold using a codon-optimized mRNA luciferase construct with flanking 3' and 5' human β-globin untranslated regions (UTR mRNA) over an un-optimized mRNA without β-globin UTRs. Nanoparticle UTR mRNA polyplexes were formed using a novel polyacridine PEG-peptide, resulting in an additional 15-fold increase in expression efficiency in the liver. The combined increase in expression for UTR mRNA PEG-peptide polyplexes was 3500-fold over mRNA lacking UTRs and PEG-peptide. The expression efficiency of UTR mRNA polyplex was 10-fold greater than the expression from an equivalent 1 μg dose of pGL3. Maximal expression was maintained from 4-24 h. Serum incubation established the unique ability of the polyacridine PEG-peptide to protect UTR mRNA polyplexes from RNase metabolism by binding to double stranded regions. UTR mRNA PEG-peptide polyplexes are efficient non-viral vectors that circumvent the need for nuclear uptake, representing an advancement toward the development of a targeted gene delivery system to transfect liver hepatocytes.Gene Therapy accepted article preview online, 30 June 2015. doi:10.1038/gt.2015.68.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Chemistry 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,911,334
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Gene Therapy
#349
of 3,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,623
of 303,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene Therapy
#12
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.