↓ Skip to main content

RIP1 Cleavage in the Kinase Domain Regulates TRAIL-Induced NF-κB Activation and Lymphoma Survival

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RIP1 Cleavage in the Kinase Domain Regulates TRAIL-Induced NF-κB Activation and Lymphoma Survival
Published in
Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
DOI 10.1128/mcb.00692-15
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although TRAIL is considered a potential anti-cancer agent, it enhances tumor progression by activating NF-κB in apoptosis-resistant cells. cFLIP overexpression and caspase-8 activation have been implicated in TRAIL-induced NF-κB activation; however, the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Here, we report that caspase-8-dependent cleavage of RIP1 in the kinase (KD) and intermediate (ID) domains determines the activation state of the NF-κB pathway in response to TRAIL treatment. In apoptosis-sensitive cells, caspase-8 cleaves RIP1 in the KD and ID domains immediately after the recruitment of RIP1 to the receptor complex, impairing IKK recruitment and NF-κB activation. In apoptosis-resistant cells, cFLIP restricts caspase-8 activity, resulting in limited RIP1 cleavage and generation of a KD-cleaved fragment capable of activating NF-κB but not apoptosis. Notably, depletion of the cytoplasmic pool of TRAF2 and cIAP1 in lymphomas by CD40 ligation inhibits basal RIP1 ubiquitination, but does not prompt cell death, due to CD40L-induced cFLIP expression and limited RIP1 cleavage. Inhibition of RIP1 cleavage at the KD suppresses NF-κB activation and cell-survival even in cFLIP-overexpressing lymphomas. Importantly, RIP1 is constitutively cleaved in human and mouse lymphomas, suggesting that cFLIP-mediated and caspase-8-dependent limited cleavage of RIP1 is a new layer of mechanism that promotes NF-κB activation and lymphoma survival.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 33%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#28,521,213
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#13,589
of 14,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,672
of 449,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#10,016
of 10,444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10,444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.