↓ Skip to main content

New insights into donor directionality of mating-type switching in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New insights into donor directionality of mating-type switching in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Published in
PLoS Genetics, May 2018
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007424
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mating-type switching in Schizosaccharomyces pombe entails programmed gene conversion events regulated by DNA replication, heterochromatin, and the HP1-like chromodomain protein Swi6. The whole mechanism remains to be fully understood. Using a gene deletion library, we screened ~ 3400 mutants for defects in the donor selection step where a heterochromatic locus, mat2-P or mat3-M, is chosen to convert the expressed mat1 locus. By measuring the biases in mat1 content that result from faulty directionality, we identified in total 20 factors required for donor selection. Unexpectedly, these included the histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferase complex subunits Set1, Swd1, Swd2, Swd3, Spf1 and Ash2, the BRE1-like ubiquitin ligase Brl2 and the Elongator complex subunit Elp6. The mutant defects were investigated in strains with reversed donor loci (mat2-M mat3-P) or when the SRE2 and SRE3 recombination enhancers, adjacent to the donors, were deleted or transposed. Mutants in Set1C, Brl2 or Elp6 altered balanced donor usage away from mat2 and the SRE2 enhancer, towards mat3 and the SRE3 enhancer. The defects in these mutants were qualitatively similar to heterochromatin mutants lacking Swi6, the NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase Sir2, or the Clr4, Raf1 or Rik1 subunits of the histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methyltransferase complex, albeit not as extreme. Other mutants showed clonal biases in switching. This was the case for mutants in the NAD+-independent deacetylase complex subunits Clr1, Clr2 and Clr3, the casein kinase CK2 subunit Ckb1, the ubiquitin ligase component Pof3, and the CENP-B homologue Cbp1, as well as for double mutants lacking Swi6 and Brl2, Pof3, or Cbp1. Thus, we propose that Set1C cooperates with Swi6 and heterochromatin to direct donor choice to mat2-P in M cells, perhaps by inhibiting the SRE3 recombination enhancer, and that in the absence of Swi6 other factors are still capable of imposing biases to donor choice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#27,757,641
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#8,622
of 9,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,679
of 375,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#127
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.