↓ Skip to main content

Multiple circadian‐regulated elements contribute to cycling period gene expression in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Journal, August 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multiple circadian‐regulated elements contribute to cycling period gene expression in Drosophila
Published in
EMBO Journal, August 1997
DOI 10.1093/emboj/16.16.5006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A new regulatory element necessary for the correct temporal expression of the period (per) gene was identified by monitoring real-time per expression in living individual flies carrying two different period-luciferase transgenes. luciferase RNA driven from only the per promoter was not sufficient to replicate the normal pattern of per RNA cycling; however, a per-luc fusion RNA driven from a transgene containing additional per sequences cycled identically to endogenous per. The results indicate the existence of at least two circadian-regulated elements--one within the promoter and one within the transcribed portion of the per gene. Phase and amplitude analysis of both per-luc transgenes revealed that normal per expression requires the regulation of these elements at distinct phases and suggests a mechanism by which biological clocks sustain high-amplitude feedback oscillations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 32%
Researcher 14 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 48%
Neuroscience 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2010.
All research outputs
#7,581,585
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Journal
#5,793
of 14,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,091
of 41,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Journal
#51
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.