↓ Skip to main content

Characterization and intraspinal grafting of EGF/bFGF-dependent neurospheres derived from embryonic rat spinal cord

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Research, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Characterization and intraspinal grafting of EGF/bFGF-dependent neurospheres derived from embryonic rat spinal cord
Published in
Brain Research, August 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02443-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent advances in the isolation and characterization of neural precursor cells suggest that they have properties that would make them useful transplants for the treatment of central nervous system disorders. We demonstrate here that spinal cord cells isolated from embryonic day 14 Sprague-Dawley and Fischer 344 rats possess characteristics of precursor cells. They proliferate as undifferentiated neurospheres in the presence of EGF and bFGF and can be maintained in vitro or frozen, expanded and induced to differentiate into both neurons and glia. Exposure of these cells to serum in the absence of EGF and bFGF promotes differentiation into astrocytes; treatment with retinoic acid promotes differentiation into neurons. Spinal cord cells labeled with a nuclear dye or a recombinant adenovirus vector carrying the lacZ gene survive grafting into the injured spinal cord of immunosuppressed Sprague-Dawley rats and non-immunosuppressed Fischer 344 rats for up to 4 months following transplantation. In the presence of exogenously supplied BDNF, the grafted cells differentiate into both neurons and glia. These spinal cord cell grafts are permissive for growth by several populations of host axons, especially when combined with exogenous BDNF administration, as demonstrated by penetration into the graft of axons immunopositive for 5-HT and CGRP. Thus, precursor cells isolated from the embryonic spinal cord of rats, expanded in culture and genetically modified, are a promising type of transplant for repair of the injured spinal cord.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Professor 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 40%
Neuroscience 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2003.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Brain Research
#3,124
of 10,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,429
of 43,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Research
#24
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.