↓ Skip to main content

Immunological approaches to the control of tuberculosis in wildlife reservoirs

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Immunological approaches to the control of tuberculosis in wildlife reservoirs
Published in
Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology, April 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0165-2427(00)00163-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Attempts to eradicate tuberculosis from cattle and farmed deer in some countries have been frustrated by the existence of wildlife reservoirs of Mycobacterium bovis infection. Possum control programmes in New Zealand using poisons have shown clearly that the brushtail possum is an important source of infection for cattle and farmed deer, and the sum of evidence strongly suggests that badgers serve as a source of infection for cattle in the UK. Bovine tuberculosis can only be eradicated from these countries by controlling M. bovis infection in both wildlife and domestic animals. The most promising options for control of M. bovis infection in wildlife in the longer term include the development of a tuberculosis vaccine for wildlife and a strategy for biological control of possums. The aim of this review is to address the problems and approaches involved in the control of wildlife tuberculosis from an immunological perspective.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 61 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 16%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2009.
All research outputs
#7,591,124
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology
#325
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,317
of 59,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Immunology & Immunopathology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.