You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hybridization rapidly reduces fitness of a native trout in the wild
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, March 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clint C. Muhlfeld, Steven T. Kalinowski, Thomas E. McMahon, Mark L. Taper, Sally Painter, Robb F. Leary, Fred W. Allendorf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 327 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 17% |
| Researcher | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 194 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,165,781
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#1,553
of 3,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,304
of 116,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#13
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.