Prenatal exposure to phthalates disrupts male sex development in rodents. In humans, the placental glycoprotein hormone human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is required for male development, and may be a target of phthalate exposure.
To test the hypothesis that phthalates disrupt placental hCG differentially in males and females with consequences for sexually dimorphic genital development.
The Infant Development and Environment Study (TIDES) is a prospective birth cohort. Pregnant women were enrolled from 2010-2012 at 4 university hospitals.
A subset of TIDES subjects (n=541/753) for whom genital and phthalate measurements were available and who underwent prenatal serum screening in the first or second trimester Main Outcome Measures: hCG levels in maternal serum in the first and second trimesters and anogenital distance (AGD), the distance from the anus to the genitals, in male and female neonates.
Higher first trimester urinary mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP, p=0.01), monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP, p=0.03) and mono-carboxy-isooctyl phthalate (MCOP, <0.01) were associated with higher first trimester hCG in women carrying female fetuses, and lower hCG in women carrying males. First trimester hCG was positively correlated with the AGD z-score in female neonates, and inversely correlated in males (p-value=0.01). We measured significant associations of MnBP (p<0.01), MBzP (p=0.02), and mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP, p<0.01) with AGD, after adjusting for sex differences. Approximately 52% (MnBP) and 25% (MEHP) of this association in males, and 78% in females (MBzP), could be attributed to the phthalate association with hCG.
First trimester hCG levels, normalized by fetal sex, may reflect sexually dimorphic action of phthalates on placental function and on genital development.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#9,685,364
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#9,543
of 21,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,284
of 299,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#78
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
