↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Freeze-dried poly(d,l-lactic acid) macroporous guidance scaffolds impregnated with brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the transected adult rat thoracic spinal cord
Published in
Biomaterials, April 2004
DOI 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00503-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla M. Patist, Mascha Borgerhoff Mulder, Sandrine E. Gautier, Véronique Maquet, Robert Jérôme, Martin Oudega

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Professor 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Neuroscience 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2011.
All research outputs
#6,689,358
of 30,990,086 outputs
Outputs from Biomaterials
#3,385
of 12,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,817
of 78,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomaterials
#30
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,990,086 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.