↓ Skip to main content

Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Public Health, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Future directions in residential segregation and health research: a multilevel approach.
Published in
American Journal of Public Health, February 2003
DOI 10.2105/ajph.93.2.215
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The authors examine the research evidence on the effect of residential segregation on health, identify research gaps, and propose new research directions. Four recommendations are made on the basis of a review of the sociological and social epidemiology literature on residential segregation: (1) develop multilevel research designs to examine the effects of individual, neighborhood, and metropolitan-area factors on health outcomes; (2) continue examining the health effects of residential segregation among African Americans but also initiate studies examining segregation among Hispanics and Asians; (3) consider racial/ethnic segregation along with income segregation and other metropolitan area factors such as poverty concentration and metropolitan governance fragmentation; and (4) develop better conceptual frameworks of the pathways that may link various segregation dimensions to specific health outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 327 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 13%
Student > Master 42 12%
Researcher 40 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 8%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 52 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 130 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 14%
Psychology 16 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 78 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,325,521
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Public Health
#2,152
of 14,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,165
of 198,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Public Health
#19
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.