↓ Skip to main content

Network-Based Integration of GWAS and Gene Expression Identifies a HOX-Centric Network Associated with Serous Ovarian Cancer Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Network-Based Integration of GWAS and Gene Expression Identifies a HOX-Centric Network Associated with Serous Ovarian Cancer Risk
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, September 2015
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siddhartha P. Kar, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Qiyuan Li, Kate Lawrenson, Katja K.H. Aben, Hoda Anton-Culver, Natalia Antonenkova, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, on behalf of the Australian Cancer Study, and on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Helen Baker, Elisa V. Bandera, Yukie T. Bean, Matthias W. Beckmann, Andrew Berchuck, Maria Bisogna, Line Bjørge, Natalia Bogdanova, Louise Brinton, Angela Brooks-Wilson, Ralf Butzow, Ian Campbell, Karen Carty, Jenny Chang-Claude, Yian Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Linda S. Cook, Daniel Cramer, Julie M. Cunningham, Cezary Cybulski, Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Joe Dennis, Ed Dicks, Jennifer A. Doherty, Thilo Dörk, Andreas du Bois, Matthias Dürst, Diana Eccles, Douglas F. Easton, Robert P. Edwards, Arif B. Ekici, Peter A. Fasching, Brooke L. Fridley, Yu-Tang Gao, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Graham G. Giles, Rosalind Glasspool, Ellen L. Goode, Marc T. Goodman, Jacek Grownwald, Patricia Harrington, Philipp Harter, Alexander Hein, Florian Heitz, Michelle A.T. Hildebrandt, Peter Hillemanns, Estrid Hogdall, Claus K. Hogdall, Satoyo Hosono, Edwin S. Iversen, Anna Jakubowska, James Paul, Allan Jensen, Bu-Tian Ji, Beth Y. Karlan, Susanne K. Kjaer, Linda E. Kelemen, Melissa Kellar, Joseph Kelley, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Camilla Krakstad, Jolanta Kupryjanczyk, Diether Lambrechts, Sandrina Lambrechts, Nhu D. Le, Alice W. Lee, Shashi Lele, Arto Leminen, Jenny Lester, Douglas A. Levine, Dong Liang, Jolanta Lissowska, Karen Lu, Jan Lubinski, Lene Lundvall, Leon Massuger, Keitaro Matsuo, Valerie McGuire, John R. McLaughlin, Iain A. McNeish, Usha Menon, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B. Moysich, Steven A. Narod, Lotte Nedergaard, Roberta B. Ness, Heli Nevanlinna, Kunle Odunsi, Sara H. Olson, Irene Orlow, Sandra Orsulic, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Tanja Pejovic, Liisa M. Pelttari, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Catherine M. Phelan, Malcolm C. Pike, Elizabeth M. Poole, Susan J. Ramus, Harvey A. Risch, Barry Rosen, Mary Anne Rossing, Joseph H. Rothstein, Anja Rudolph, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Iwona K. Rzepecka, Helga B. Salvesen, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Ira Schwaab, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yurii B. Shvetsov, Nadeem Siddiqui, Weiva Sieh, Honglin Song, Melissa C. Southey, Lara E. Sucheston-Campbell, Ingvild L. Tangen, Soo-Hwang Teo, Kathryn L. Terry, Pamela J. Thompson, Agnieszka Timorek, Ya-Yu Tsai, Shelley S. Tworoger, Anne M. van Altena, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Ignace Vergote, Robert A. Vierkant, Shan Wang-Gohrke, Christine Walsh, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S. Whittemore, Kristine G. Wicklund, Lynne R. Wilkens, Yin-Ling Woo, Xifeng Wu, Anna Wu, Hannah Yang, Wei Zheng, Argyrios Ziogas, Thomas A. Sellers, Alvaro N.A. Monteiro, Matthew L. Freedman, Simon A. Gayther, Paul D.P. Pharoah

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 92 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Professor 9 9%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,686,923
of 32,526,325 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2,125
of 5,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,324
of 303,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,526,325 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.