↓ Skip to main content

A risk and benefit assessment for visual-only meat inspection of indoor and outdoor pigs in the United Kingdom

Overview of attention for article published in Food Control, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A risk and benefit assessment for visual-only meat inspection of indoor and outdoor pigs in the United Kingdom
Published in
Food Control, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.031
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Botswana 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 14%
Engineering 4 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,515,738
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Food Control
#1,054
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,773
of 212,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Control
#20
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.