↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of Cysticercus bovis in Australian cattle

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Veterinary Journal, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevalence of Cysticercus bovis in Australian cattle
Published in
Australian Veterinary Journal, June 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00593.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

BHG Pearse, RJ Traub, A Davis, R Cobbold, PB Vanderlinde

Abstract

The first national abattoir survey of Cysticercus bovis ('beef measles') in cattle was conducted in February 2008. During the data collection period, 493,316 cattle were subjected to standard postmortem procedures, including incision of the masseter and heart muscles. On-site veterinarians were asked to record the location of any C. bovis cysts, as well as the National Livestock Identification System ear tag numbers of infected animals. Veterinarians were asked to submit samples for laboratory confirmation by histology and polymerase chain reaction testing. Of the 23 samples submitted, none was positive for C. bovis by either diagnostic method. Occasional, isolated diagnoses of beef measles are still made in most states of Australia, but since the last regional surveys were conducted 30 years ago, when the estimated prevalence was 50 to 200 per 100,000 cattle slaughtered, the parasite has become extremely rare.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 30%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 20%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,757,413
of 26,475,389 outputs
Outputs from Australian Veterinary Journal
#158
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,866
of 107,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Veterinary Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,475,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them