↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nitric oxide mediates dendritic cell apoptosis by downregulating inhibitors of apoptosis proteins and upregulating effector caspase activity
Published in
Surgery, August 2001
DOI 10.1067/msy.2001.116411
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) play a crucial role in the amplification of the immune response by promoting antigen presentation, T-lymphocyte proliferation, and proinflammatory cytokine and nitric oxide (NO) production. We have previously shown that the exogenous NO donor, s-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine, promotes DC apoptosis by disrupting the mitochondrial membrane potential, which induces cytochrome-C release and activates caspase 3. To further elucidate the signaling pathway, we examined the expression of cellular inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage (PARP), a terminal event in the apoptotic cascade. DC2.4 were exposed to 250 micromol/L s-nitroso-N-acetyl-penicillamine for various intervals. Apoptosis and necrosis were measured by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase nick-end labeling assay or flow cytometry with Annexin V and propidium iodide. DC2.4 were cultured with the pan-caspase inhibitor, ZVAD (100 micromol/L). cIAP, pro-caspases, and PARP expression or activation was measured by Western blot. Caspase enzyme activity was confirmed with the use of specific substrates. NO-induced DC apoptosis correlated with the downregulation of cIAP expression. Caspase 3 and 6 were upregulated by SNAP and significantly inhibited by ZVAD. Maximal PARP cleavage occurred at 8 hours and coincided with the downregulation of cIAP and peak caspase 3 and near maximal caspase 6 activity. NO-induced DC apoptosis is associated with the downregulation of cIAP expression, which facilitates caspase cascade activation and subsequent PARP cleavage.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2009.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Surgery
#3,550
of 7,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,539
of 45,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.