↓ Skip to main content

The balance between feeling and knowing: affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain's intrinsic functional dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
11 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
659 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The balance between feeling and knowing: affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain's intrinsic functional dynamics
Published in
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, September 2011
DOI 10.1093/scan/nsr051
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Affective empathy (AE) is distinguished clinically and neurally from cognitive empathy (CE). While AE is selectively disrupted in psychopathy, autism is associated with deficits in CE. Despite such dissociations, AE and CE together contribute to normal human empathic experience. A dimensional measure of individual differences in AE 'relative to' CE captures this interaction and may reveal brain-behavior relationships beyond those detectable with AE and CE separately. Using resting-state fMRI and measures of empathy in healthy adults, we show that relative empathic ability (REA) is reflected in the brain's intrinsic functional dynamics. Dominance of AE was associated with stronger functional connectivity among social-emotional regions (ventral anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, perigenual anterior cingulate). Dominance of CE was related to stronger connectivity among areas implicated in interoception, autonomic monitoring and social-cognitive processing (brainstem, superior temporal sulcus, ventral anterior insula). These patterns were distinct from those observed with AE and CE separately. Finally, REA and the strength of several functional connections were associated with symptoms of psychopathology. These findings suggest that REA provides a dimensional index of empathic function and pathological tendencies in healthy adults, which are reflected in the intrinsic functional dynamics of neural systems associated with social and emotional cognition.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 659 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Germany 7 1%
Japan 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 621 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 117 18%
Researcher 98 15%
Student > Master 88 13%
Student > Bachelor 63 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 7%
Other 104 16%
Unknown 145 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 268 41%
Neuroscience 59 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 8%
Social Sciences 26 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 4%
Other 71 11%
Unknown 160 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2026.
All research outputs
#625,155
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#136
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,122
of 174,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.