↓ Skip to main content

Wnt-5/pipetail functions in vertebrate axis formation as a negative regulator of Wnt/β-catenin activity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Wnt-5/pipetail functions in vertebrate axis formation as a negative regulator of Wnt/β-catenin activity
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, September 2003
DOI 10.1083/jcb.200303107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trudi A. Westfall, Ryan Brimeyer, Jen Twedt, Jean Gladon, Andrea Olberding, Makoto Furutani-Seiki, Diane C. Slusarski

Abstract

We provide genetic evidence defining a role for noncanonical Wnt function in vertebrate axis formation. In zebrafish, misexpression of Wnt-4, -5, and -11 stimulates calcium (Ca2+) release, defining the Wnt/Ca2+ class. We describe genetic interaction between two Wnt/Ca2+ members, Wnt-5 (pipetail) and Wnt-11 (silberblick), and a reduction of Ca2+ release in Wnt-5/pipetail. Embryos genetically depleted of both maternal and zygotic Wnt-5 product exhibit cell movement defects as well as hyperdorsalization and axis-duplication phenotypes. The dorsalized phenotypes result from increased beta-catenin accumulation and activation of downstream genes. The Wnt-5 loss-of-function defect is consistent with Ca2+ modulation having an antagonistic interaction with Wnt/beta-catenin signaling.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 127 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 28%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Professor 6 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 39 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2010.
All research outputs
#12,311,486
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#8,296
of 13,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,970
of 77,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#49
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.