↓ Skip to main content

Targeted deletion of titin N2B region leads to diastolic dysfunction and cardiac atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Targeted deletion of titin N2B region leads to diastolic dysfunction and cardiac atrophy
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2007
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0608543104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 25%
Researcher 22 24%
Student > Master 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Engineering 6 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2010.
All research outputs
#12,436,002
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#83,908
of 119,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,867
of 129,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#525
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.