↓ Skip to main content

RURAL LAND‐USE TRENDS IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES, 1950–2000

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
608 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
563 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RURAL LAND‐USE TRENDS IN THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES, 1950–2000
Published in
Ecological Applications, December 2005
DOI 10.1890/03-5220
Authors

Daniel G. Brown, Kenneth M. Johnson, Thomas R. Loveland, David M. Theobald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 31 6%
Canada 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 513 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 127 23%
Researcher 120 21%
Student > Master 96 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 100 18%
Unknown 58 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 183 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 138 25%
Social Sciences 55 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 44 8%
Engineering 19 3%
Other 39 7%
Unknown 85 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,777,283
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,600
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,577
of 163,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.