↓ Skip to main content

Lysophosphatidic Acid Influences the Morphology and Motility of Young, Postmitotic Cortical Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in MCN: Molecular & Cellular Neuroscience, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lysophosphatidic Acid Influences the Morphology and Motility of Young, Postmitotic Cortical Neurons
Published in
MCN: Molecular & Cellular Neuroscience, June 2002
DOI 10.1006/mcne.2002.1123
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lysophospholipid that produces process retraction and cell rounding through its cognate receptors in neuroblastoma cell lines. Although the expression profile of LPA receptors in developing brains suggests a role for LPA in central nervous system (CNS) development, how LPA influences the morphology of postmitotic CNS neurons remains to be determined. Here we have investigated the effects of exogenous LPA on the morphology of young, postmitotic neurons in primary culture. When treated with LPA, these neurons responded by not only retracting processes but also producing retraction fiber "caps" characterized by fine actin filaments emanating from a dense core. Retraction fiber caps gradually vanished due to the outward spread of regrowing membranes along the fibers, suggesting a role for caps as scaffolds for regrowth of retracted processes. Furthermore, LPA also affects neuronal migration in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, these results implicate LPA as an extracellular lipid signal affecting process outgrowth and migration of early postmitotic neurons during development.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Spain 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 62 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Neuroscience 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2011.
All research outputs
#12,343,970
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from MCN: Molecular & Cellular Neuroscience
#746
of 1,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,154
of 177,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MCN: Molecular & Cellular Neuroscience
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.