↓ Skip to main content

The Introduction of Nonnative Fish into Wilderness Lakes: Good Intentions, Conflicting Mandates, and Unintended Consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Introduction of Nonnative Fish into Wilderness Lakes: Good Intentions, Conflicting Mandates, and Unintended Consequences
Published in
Ecosystems, May 2001
DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0009-0
Authors

Roland A. Knapp, Paul Stephen Corn, Daniel E. Schindler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Brazil 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 24%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 47%
Environmental Science 52 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,309,636
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#355
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,083
of 43,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.