↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of mutations at positions 115 and 116 in the dNTP binding site of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of mutations at positions 115 and 116 in the dNTP binding site of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2000
DOI 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3056
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have examined amino acid substitutions at residues 115 and 116 in the reverse transcriptase (RT) of HIV-1. A number of properties were examined, including polymerization and processivity on both DNA and RNA templates, strand displacement, ribonucleotide misincorporation, and resistance to nucleoside analogs. The RT variants Tyr-115-Phe and Phe-116-Tyr are similar to wild-type HIV-1 RT in most, but not all, respects. In contrast, the RT variant Tyr-115-Val is significantly impaired in polymerase activity compared with wild-type RT; however, Tyr-115-Val is able to incorporate ribonucleotides as well as deoxyribonucleotides during polymerization and is resistant to a variety of nucleoside analogs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,582,289
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#63,366
of 118,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,282
of 59,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#278
of 551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.