MRI plays a crucial role in the initial diagnosis, treatment planning, and long-term management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Technological advances have enabled improvements in both delineation of anatomic detail, and in functional imaging techniques that interrogate tissues at the cellular level. This bears particular relevance in sarcomas as morphological parameters alone do not necessarily correlate with treatment response and prognosis. Here, we describe recent developments in advanced MRI techniques, including chemical-shift MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI.
Chemical-shift MRI allows robust discrimination of marrow infiltrating neoplasms from benign red marrow. DWI reveals tumor cellularity, and aids in distinguishing benign and malignant tumors along with the assessment of treatment response. MRS is technically challenging in the musculoskeletal system, but shows promise as a means to noninvasively assess metabolic aberrations in a variety of sarcomas. DCE is particularly suited to treatment response evaluation, in which traditional size-based assessment criteria may underestimate efficacy in clinical trials.
Functional MRI techniques offer novel imaging biomarkers that effectively complement conventional MRI in the assessment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas at all stages of patient care.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#31,228,668
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in oncology
#1,384
of 1,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,738
of 302,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in oncology
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
