↓ Skip to main content

Effecting Change in an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum: Librarians’ Role in a Pediatric Residency Program

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Reference Services Quarterly, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effecting Change in an Evidence-Based Medicine Curriculum: Librarians’ Role in a Pediatric Residency Program
Published in
Medical Reference Services Quarterly, July 2015
DOI 10.1080/02763869.2015.1052702
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Librarians for the joint Phoenix Children's Hospital/Maricopa Medical Center Pediatric Residency Program were asked to assist on the Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) Subcommittee for the program. Faculty was open to recommendations for revising and improving the curriculum and desired librarian assistance in completing the task. The annual program review and conference evaluations revealed a gap between the objectives of the EBM curriculum and the residents' perceived abilities to integrate knowledge into meaningful literature searches. This column demonstrates how librarians can collaborate with their residency programs to revise and improve processes to effect change in their program's EBM curriculum.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 16 48%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Social Sciences 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#16,469,017
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from Medical Reference Services Quarterly
#189
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,052
of 275,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Reference Services Quarterly
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.