↓ Skip to main content

Ultraviolet-C light inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes on organic fruit surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Food Microbiology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 3,781)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ultraviolet-C light inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes on organic fruit surfaces
Published in
International Journal of Food Microbiology, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.06.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study investigated UV-C light inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of organic apples, pears, strawberries, red raspberries and cantaloupes. Fruit surfaces spot inoculated with cocktail strains of E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes were exposed to UV-C doses up to 11.9kJ/m(2) at 23°C. Fruit surface roughness, contact angle, and surface energy were determined and correlated with UV-C inactivation kinetics. Results demonstrate that bacterial pathogens on fruit surfaces respond differently to UV-C light exposure. E. coli O157:H7 on apple and pear surfaces was reduced by 2.9 and 2.1logCFU/g, respectively when treated with UV-C light at 0.92kJ/m(2) (60s). For berries, the reduction of E. coli O157:H7 was lower with 2.0 (strawberry) and 1.1logCFU/g (raspberry) achieved after UV-C treatment at 7.2kJ/m(2) (8min) and at 10.5kJ/m(2) (12min), respectively. Similarly, a higher reduction of L. monocytogenes was observed on apple (1.6logCFU/g at 3.75kJ/m(2)) and pear (1.7logCFU/g at 11.9kJ/m(2)) surfaces compared to cantaloupe and strawberry surfaces (both achieved 1.0logCFU/g at 11.9kJ/m(2)). L. monocytogenes shows more resistance than E. coli O157:H7. Inactivation rates were higher for less hydrophobic fruits with smoother surfaces (apples and pears) as compared to fruits with rougher surfaces (cantaloupe, strawberry and raspberry). Findings indicate that UV-C light can effectively reduce E. coli O157:H7 and L. monocytogenes populations on fruit and berry surfaces. However, surface characteristics influence the efficacy of UV-C light.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Armenia 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 60 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 35%
Engineering 11 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 72 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#882,651
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Food Microbiology
#45
of 3,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,340
of 278,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Food Microbiology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.