| Title |
Microtubules soften due to cross-sectional flattening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eLife, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.7554/elife.34695 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edvin Memet, Feodor Hilitski, Margaret A Morris, Walter J Schwenger, Zvonimir Dogic, L Mahadevan |
| Abstract |
We use optical trapping to continuously bend an isolated microtubule while simultaneously measuring the applied force and the resulting filament strain, thus allowing us to determine its elastic properties over a wide range of applied strains. We find that, while in the low-strain regime, microtubules may be quantitatively described in terms of the classical Euler-Bernoulli elastic filament, above a critical strain they deviate from this simple elastic model, showing a softening response with increasing deformations. A three-dimensional thin-shell model, in which the increased mechanical compliance is caused by flattening and eventual buckling of the filament cross-section, captures this softening effect in the high strain regime and yields quantitative values of the effective mechanical properties of microtubules. Our results demonstrate that properties of microtubules are highly dependent on the magnitude of the applied strain and offer a new interpretation for the large variety in microtubule mechanical data measured by different methods. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 22 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 18 | 45% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 12% |
| Engineering | 10 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |