What is the central question of the study? What is the main finding and its importance? 1. Is the reduced signalling of AMPK, a key regulator of energy homeostasis in the heart, responsible for the reduced β-adrenergic responsiveness of the heart in obesity? 2. Inhibition of AMPK in isolated hearts prevented the reduced cardiac β-adrenergic responsiveness of obese rats, which was accompanied by reduced phosphorylation of AMPK, a proxy of AMPK activity. This suggests a direct functional link between β-adrenergic responsiveness and AMPK signalling in the heart, and that AMPK might be an important target to restore the β-adrenergic responsiveness in the heart in obesity.
The obesity epidemic impacts heavily on cardiovascular health, in part due to changes in cardiac metabolism. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key regulator of energy homeostasis in the heart, and is regulated by β-adrenoceptors (AR) under normal conditions. In obesity, chronic sympathetic overactivation leads to impaired cardiac β-AR responsiveness, although it is unclear whether AMPK signalling, downstream of β-AR, contributes to this dysfunction. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether reduced AMPK signalling is responsible for the reduced β-AR responsiveness in obesity. In isolated hearts of lean and obese Zucker rats, we tested β-AR responsiveness to β1 -AR agonist isoproterenol (ISO, 1 × 10-10 - 5 × 10-8 M) in the absence and presence of the AMPK inhibitor compound C (CC, 10 μM). β1 -AR expression and AMPK phosphorylation were assessed by Western blot. β-Adrenergic responsiveness was reduced in the hearts of obese rats (LogEC50 of ISO-developed pressure dose-response curves: lean -8.53 ± 0.13 vs. obese -8.35 ± 0.10 10x M; p < 0.05 lean vs. obese, n = 6 per group). This difference was not apparent after AMPK inhibition (LogEC50 of ISO-developed pressure curves: lean CC -8.19 ± 0.12 vs. obese CC 8.17 ± 0.13 10x M, p > 0.05, n = 6 per group). β1 -AR expression and AMPK phosphorylation were reduced in hearts of obese rats (AMPK at Thr172 : lean 1.73 ± 0.17 vs. lean CC 0.81 ± 0.13, and obese 1.18 ± 0.09 vs. obese CC 0.81 ± 0.16 arbitrary units, p < 0.05, n = 6 per group). Thus, a direct functional link between β-adrenergic responsiveness and AMPK signalling in the heart exists, and AMPK might be an important target to restore the reduced cardiac β-adrenergic responsiveness in obesity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
2
17%
Nursing and Health Professions
2
17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
1
8%
Unknown
5
42%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,852,160
of 27,788,803 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Physiology
#889
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,781
of 347,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Physiology
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
