↓ Skip to main content

Plasmodium vivax treatments

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in infectious diseases, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Plasmodium vivax treatments
Published in
Current opinion in infectious diseases, December 2011
DOI 10.1097/qco.0b013e32834c61e3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

For over 50 years, the treatment of Plasmodium vivax has relied on a combination of chloroquine and primaquine, but this strategy is under threat. Chloroquine efficacy is now compromised across much of the vivax endemic world and there are significant operational difficulties in deploying primaquine. We review the recent advances in P. vivax chemotherapy that may influence the future management of this neglected pathogen.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Brazil 2 3%
Thailand 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
India 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 61 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Chemistry 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2011.
All research outputs
#24,751,637
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in infectious diseases
#1,297
of 1,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,531
of 302,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in infectious diseases
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.