↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phase I study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer with PTV<100cc using a continual reassessment method (JCOG0702)
Published in
Radiotherapy & Oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to determine the recommended dose (RD) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) with target volume (PTV) < 100cc. The continual reassessment method (CRM) was used to determine the dose level that patients should be assigned to and to estimate the MTD. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (RP) within 180days after the start of SBRT, grade 2 RP was used as a surrogate DLT. The RD was equal to the MTD. The dose was prescribed at D95 of the PTV. Fifteen patients were accrued. Only 1 experienced grade 2 RP at 60Gy in 4 fractions. It was difficult to fulfill the dose constraints at 60Gy in 4 fractions, and the maximum dose level assigned by CRM was changed to 55Gy in 4 fractions. The lower limit of 95% of the credible interval exceeded the adjacent level, and the RD was determined as 55Gy in 4 fractions. The RD of SBRT for peripheral T2N0M0 NSCLC with PTV<100cc was determined to be 55Gy in 4 fractions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 2 4%
Kenya 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Mathematics 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2016.
All research outputs
#31,227,209
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#5,589
of 6,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,222
of 299,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#85
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.