Sedimentary rare earth element (REE) signatures can provide powerful insights into nearshore biogeochemical processes and anthropogenic influences. Despite this, there is limited research investigating REE behaviour in sediments influenced by coastal acid sulfate soils (CASS). Here, we explore REE abundance and fractionation in intertidal mangrove sediments that received CASS drainage for ~15-20y within the Hastings Catchment in NSW, Australia. Sediments close to the CASS discharge point (<200m) were compared with those further downstream (1300-1600m), and at a nearby control site. Average ΣREE concentrations were highest near the CASS discharge point (148-186mg/kg), and decreased with distance downstream (111-146mg/kg) and in control sediments (70mg/kg). Reactive Fe concentrations (defined by 1M HCl extractability) were also significantly higher in surface sediments (0-6cm) near the CASS discharge point. Middle-REE (MREE) enrichments dominated fractionation patterns at all sites (>1.5), with a high proportion (63-100%) of REEs residing in the reactive (1M HCl extractable) sediment fraction. Interestingly, the degree of MREE enrichment was significantly correlated with Ce anomalies (r(2)=0.72, P<0.001) and the heavy-REE (HREE) to light-REE (LREE) ratios (HREE/LREE, r(2)=0.74, P<0.001) in the reactive sediment fraction, only in those sites situated closest to the CASS drainage. The observed high MREE enrichments, positive Ce anomalies (>1) and HREE/LREE ratios (>1) are consistent with reactive Fe(III) oxides/oxyhydroxides driving REE retention in these sediments. This study indicates that CASS drainage alters REE signatures in receiving sediments by (1) providing a source of REEs, thereby enhancing sedimentary REE concentrations, and (2) causing accumulation of reactive Fe(III) phases with a high affinity for REEs. Together, these two factors drive the development of distinctive REE signatures in CASS-impacted sediments. The recognition of such signatures may provide a promising tool for identifying coastal sediments receiving anthropogenic CASS drainage inputs.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2018.
All research outputs
#28,170,240
of 33,924,920 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#29,774
of 36,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,835
of 336,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#275
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,924,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
