↓ Skip to main content

Auxiliary subunits highlight a role for the LBD–TMD linkers in glutamate receptor desensitization

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Auxiliary subunits highlight a role for the LBD–TMD linkers in glutamate receptor desensitization
Published in
Journal of Physiology, November 2015
DOI 10.1113/jp271434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiology
#10,672
of 12,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,517
of 318,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiology
#81
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.