↓ Skip to main content

S-Nitrosylation links obesity-associated inflammation to endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
S-Nitrosylation links obesity-associated inflammation to endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction
Published in
Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa0079
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The association between inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been observed in many diseases. However, if and how chronic inflammation regulates the unfolded protein response (UPR) and alters ER homeostasis in general, or in the context of chronic disease, remains unknown. Here, we show that, in the setting of obesity, inflammatory input through increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activity causes S-nitrosylation of a key UPR regulator, IRE1α, which leads to a progressive decline in hepatic IRE1α-mediated XBP1 splicing activity in both genetic (ob/ob) and dietary (high-fat diet-induced) models of obesity. Finally, in obese mice with liver-specific IRE1α deficiency, reconstitution of IRE1α expression with a nitrosylation-resistant variant restored IRE1α-mediated XBP1 splicing and improved glucose homeostasis in vivo. Taken together, these data describe a mechanism by which inflammatory pathways compromise UPR function through iNOS-mediated S-nitrosylation of IRE1α, which contributes to defective IRE1α activity, impaired ER function, and prolonged ER stress in obesity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 196 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 20%
Student > Master 20 10%
Other 12 6%
Professor 11 5%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 53 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,718,444
of 28,833,811 outputs
Outputs from Science
#26,095
of 87,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,401
of 278,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#623
of 1,357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,833,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.