Clarifying the terminology that describes scientific reproducibility

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, July 2015

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog
twitter: 6 X users

facebook: 1 Facebook page
googleplus: 1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley: 65 Mendeley
citeulike: 1 CiteULike

So far, Altmetric has seen 10 X posts from 6 X users, with an upper bound of 13,140 followers.

@HeidiBaya @iacus @BoulesteixLaure this 2way table is missing the critical dimension of study design. We explain this in https://t.co/8xKf8taw0C

RT @RonKenett: @learnfromerror And, they do not only use likelihood and probability as interchangeable terms, in a matter of speech, they a…

@learnfromerror And, they do not only use likelihood and probability as interchangeable terms, in a matter of speech, they also invert the meaning of reproducibility and repeatability (at least as used by industry and many other scientists) https://t.co…

I am glad they adopt the terminology we refer to in https://t.co/8xKf8sSUC2 and not the terminology with reverse meaning used in https://t.co/6y135Th7BP. However a big lacuna in this PloS paper is the complete neglect of generalisation of findings https…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 6 additional X posts.