↓ Skip to main content

Role of habit in treatment adherence among adults with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Role of habit in treatment adherence among adults with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Thorax, June 2018
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211453
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Among adults with cystic fibrosis (CF), medication adherence is low and reasons for low adherence are poorly understood. Our previous exploratory study showed that stronger 'habit' (ie, automatically experiencing an urge to use a nebuliser) was associated with higher nebuliser adherence. We performed a secondary analysis of pilot trial data (n=61) to replicate the earlier study and determine whether habit-adherence association exists in other cohorts of adults with CF. In this study, high adherers also reported stronger habit compared with low adherers. Habit may be a promising target for self-management interventions. ACtiF pilot, ISRCTN13076797.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 25 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 19%
Psychology 9 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 29 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#9,581,771
of 28,860,665 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#3,890
of 6,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,852
of 348,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#40
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,860,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.