Recent years have seen an increase in the use of dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients presenting for surgical procedures. However, only a limited number of studies have evaluated its effects on the QT interval in this patient group. To address this lack of knowledge, we have evaluated the effects of dexmedetomidine on the QT interval in children receiving sevoflurane anesthesia.
This study was a prospective case-control study in which pediatric patients presenting for anesthetic care were divided into two groups-the dexmedetomidine (D) and control (C) groups. Three electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained on each patient, including a baseline ECG (T1) prior to anesthetic induction and an ECG after the induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane (T2). In group D, the third ECG was obtained 2 min after the administration of dexmedetomidine, which in turn was started immediately after the T2 ECG reading (T3D); in group C, it was obtained 2 min after the T2 reading (T3C). Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance to compare the QT intervals at the three time points outlined above.
A total of 50 patients were recruited to the study, ranging in age from 1 to 16 [mean 7.9 ± 4.1 (SD) years]. There were 25 patients in group C and 25 in group D. There were no statistical differences in the demographics between the 2 groups. In group C, the QTc was noted to increase progressively with the administration of sevoflurane (T3C vs. T1; P = 0.006). In group D, following the administration of dexmedetomidine, there was a significant decrease in the QTc relative to the post-induction value [436 ± 25 (T2) vs. 418 ± 17 ms (T3D); P < 0.01].
A progressive lengthening of the QTc interval following the administration of sevoflurane was observed in the control group. In the dexmedetomidine group, there was a significant shortening of the QTc interval following the administration of dexmedetomidine compared to the length of the post-induction QTc interval and when compared to the control group.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
2
9%
Nursing and Health Professions
1
5%
Neuroscience
1
5%
Unknown
4
18%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,232,642
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#353
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,074
of 264,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
