Multicenter Study of Device-Associated Infection Rates, Bacterial Resistance, Length of Stay, and Mortality in Intensive Care Units of 2 Cities of Vietnam
The aim of the study was to report the results of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) study conducted from May 2008 to March 2015.
A device-associated healthcare-acquired infection surveillance study in three adult intensive care units (ICUs) and 1 neonatal ICU from 4 hospitals in Vietnam using U.S. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) definitions and criteria as well as INICC methods.
We followed 1592 adult ICU patients for 12,580 bed-days and 845 neonatal ICU patients for 4907 bed-days. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) per 1000 central line-days rate was 9.8 in medical/surgical UCIs and 1.5 in the medical ICU. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rate per 1000 mechanical ventilator-days was 13.4 in medical/surgical ICUs and 23.7 in the medical ICU. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rate per 1000 urinary catheter-days was 0.0 in medical/surgical ICUs and 5.3 in the medical ICU. While most device-associated healthcare-acquired infection rates were similar to INICC international rates (4.9 [CLABSI]; 16.5 [VAP]; 5.3 [CAUTI]), they were higher than CDC/NHSN rates (0.8 [CLABSI], 1.1 [VAP], and 1.3 [CAUTI]) for medical/surgical ICUs, with the exception of CAUTI rate for medical/surgical ICU and CLABSI rate for the medical ICU. Because of limited resources of our Vietnamese ICUs, cultures could not be taken as required by the CDC/NHSN criteria, and therefore, there was underreporting of CLABSI and CAUTI, influencing their rates. Most device utilization ratios and bacterial resistance percentages were higher than INICC and CDC/NHSN rates.
Device-associated healthcare-acquired infection rates found in the ICUs of our study were higher than CDC/NHSN US rates, but similar to INICC international rates. It is necessary to build more capacity to conduct surveillance and prevention strategies.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
1
1%
Other
1
1%
Unknown
46
66%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2021.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient Safety
#1,006
of 1,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,324
of 342,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient Safety
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
