↓ Skip to main content

Energy Availability, Macronutrient Intake, and Nutritional Supplementation for Improving Exercise Performance in Endurance Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Sports Medicine Reports, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,529)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
63 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Energy Availability, Macronutrient Intake, and Nutritional Supplementation for Improving Exercise Performance in Endurance Athletes
Published in
Current Sports Medicine Reports, June 2018
DOI 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000494
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Endurance athletes use nutritional guidelines and supplements to improve exercise performance and recovery. However, use is not always based on scientific evidence of improved performance, which type of athlete would benefit most, or the optimal dose and timing of a particular supplement. Health professionals that give advice to athletes need to target their recommendations on the energy systems and muscle fiber types used for the athlete's sporting event, the goal of the training block, the time of the competitive season, and the characteristics and food preferences of the individual athlete. This review aims to summarize the most current research findings on the optimal calorie, carbohydrate, and protein intake for athlete health, performance, and recovery. We also summarized new findings on fluid intake and the optimal dose and timing of beetroot and caffeine supplementation on time trial performance in endurance athletes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 433 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 18%
Student > Master 43 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 4%
Student > Postgraduate 16 4%
Other 57 13%
Unknown 201 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 75 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Other 18 4%
Unknown 209 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#424,961
of 32,233,056 outputs
Outputs from Current Sports Medicine Reports
#45
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,471
of 361,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Sports Medicine Reports
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,233,056 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.