↓ Skip to main content

Screening for Cardiovascular Disease Risk With Electrocardiography: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
75 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
172 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
4 Redditors
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Screening for Cardiovascular Disease Risk With Electrocardiography: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2018
DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.6848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 172 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 10%
Student > Master 20 9%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 93 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 21%
Engineering 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 108 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 749. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2026.
All research outputs
#33,426
of 34,539,236 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#705
of 42,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#573
of 373,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#13
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,539,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.