↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Work Demand and Gender on Occupational and Psychosocial Stress in Hispanic Farmworkers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural Safety & Health, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 232)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of Work Demand and Gender on Occupational and Psychosocial Stress in Hispanic Farmworkers
Published in
Journal of Agricultural Safety & Health, April 2017
DOI 10.13031/jash.11753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan TePoel, Diane Rohlman, Meagan Shaw

Abstract

Hispanic farmworkers experience hazardous work conditions, language barriers, poverty, and limited healthcare access that increase their risk for health problems. We sought to characterize occupational and lifestyle stressors in farmworker couples and to examine the impact of seasonal work demand and gender on health outcomes. We administered surveys to 31 couples (N = 62) in May (low work demand) and September (high work demand) of 2012. Measures included acculturation, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, quality of life, decision latitude, support (supervisor, co-worker), and work-family conflict. This population did not report significant differences in stress in low and high work demand times. Women reported more work-family conflict (F = 19.06, p 0.0001; F = 11.28, p = 0.0015) and less supervisor support (F = 6.56, p = 0.0135). Women experienced more conflict between work and family and less support at work. This group reported low depressive symptomology and moderate levels of stress; a subset reported elevated levels.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 17%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,775,475
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural Safety & Health
#22
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,083
of 354,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural Safety & Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them