↓ Skip to main content

iRhoms 1 and 2 are essential upstream regulators of ADAM17-dependent EGFR signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
iRhoms 1 and 2 are essential upstream regulators of ADAM17-dependent EGFR signaling
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1505649112
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The metalloproteinase ADAM17 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17) controls EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling by liberating EGFR ligands from their membrane anchor. Consequently, a patient lacking ADAM17 has skin and intestinal barrier defects that are likely caused by lack of EGFR signaling, and Adam17(-/-) mice die perinatally with open eyes, like Egfr(-/-) mice. A hallmark feature of ADAM17-dependent EGFR ligand shedding is that it can be rapidly and posttranslationally activated in a manner that requires its transmembrane domain but not its cytoplasmic domain. This suggests that ADAM17 is regulated by other integral membrane proteins, although much remains to be learned about the underlying mechanism. Recently, inactive Rhomboid 2 (iRhom2), which has seven transmembrane domains, emerged as a molecule that controls the maturation and function of ADAM17 in myeloid cells. However, iRhom2(-/-) mice appear normal, raising questions about how ADAM17 is regulated in other tissues. Here we report that iRhom1/2(-/-) double knockout mice resemble Adam17(-/-) and Egfr(-/-) mice in that they die perinatally with open eyes, misshapen heart valves, and growth plate defects. Mechanistically, we show lack of mature ADAM17 and strongly reduced EGFR phosphorylation in iRhom1/2(-/-) tissues. Finally, we demonstrate that iRhom1 is not essential for mouse development but regulates ADAM17 maturation in the brain, except in microglia, where ADAM17 is controlled by iRhom2. These results provide genetic, cell biological, and biochemical evidence that a principal function of iRhoms1/2 during mouse development is to regulate ADAM17-dependent EGFR signaling, suggesting that iRhoms1/2 could emerge as novel targets for treatment of ADAM17/EGFR-dependent pathologies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 38 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2025.
All research outputs
#4,926,745
of 33,953,699 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46,803
of 117,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,535
of 307,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#521
of 919 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,953,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 919 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.