↓ Skip to main content

Parental perceptions of avoidability of their child's emergency department visit

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Medicine Journal, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Parental perceptions of avoidability of their child's emergency department visit
Published in
Emergency Medicine Journal, August 2015
DOI 10.1136/emermed-2015-204790
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To identify the factors associated with paediatric emergency department (ED) visits and parental perceptions of the avoidability of their child's ED visit. Cross-sectional study by performing secondary analysis of 2010-2011 Iowa Child and Family Household Health Survey data. State-wide representative population-based sample of families with at least one child in the state of Iowa in the USA. Among the eligible households, 2386 families completed the survey, yielding a cooperation rate of 80%. Presence of a medical home. Child visiting an ED in the past year; parents believing that ED care could have been provided in a primary-care setting. Among children who needed medical care in the past year, 26% visited an ED. Younger children, non-Hispanic black children, non-Hispanic others, children whose parents were not married, children who were from food-insecure households and had poorer health status were more likely to visit an ED. Having a medical home was not associated with ED visits (OR=0.80, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.04), even after stratifying by the child's health status. About 69% of parents who took their child to an ED agreed that ED care could have been provided in a primary-care setting. Parents of children with public insurance, those who were not referred to the ED and those who could not get routine care appointments were more likely to report a primary-care preventable ED visit. The majority of parents believed that paediatric ED visits could be avoided if adequate primary-care alternatives were available. Expanding access to primary care could lead to a reduction in avoidable ED visits by children.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Librarian 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2016.
All research outputs
#5,672,380
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Journal
#1,734
of 4,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,531
of 265,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Journal
#35
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.