↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Safety, efficacy and glucose turnover of reduced prandial boluses during closed‐loop therapy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, October 2015
DOI 10.1111/dom.12549
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We evaluate safety, efficacy and glucose turnover during closed-loop with meal announcement using reduced prandial insulin boluses in adolescents with type 1 diabetes(T1D). Randomized cross-over study comparing closed-loop with standard prandial insulin boluses versus closed-loop with prandial boluses reduced by 25%. Eight adolescents with T1D [M3; age 15.9(1.5)yrs; A1C 8.9(1.6)%; mean(SD); total daily dose 0.9(0.7, 1.1)IU/kg/d; median(IQR)] studied on two 36-hour-long visits. In random order, subjects received closed-loop with either standard or reduced insulin boluses administered with main meals [(50-80 g carbohydrates(CHO)] but not with snacks (15-30gCHO). Stable-label tracer dilution methodology measured total glucose appearance (Ra_total) and glucose disposal (Rd). Time in target (70-180 mg/dl) was comparable [74(66,84)% vs 80(65,96)%, p = 0.87] and so was time above 180 mg/dl [21.8(16.3,33.5)% vs 18.0(4.1,34.2)%, p = 0.87] and below 70 mg/dl [0(0,1.5)% vs 0(0,1.8)%, p = 0.88]. Mean plasma glucose was identical during the two interventions [152(16) vs 152(17)mg/dl, reduced vs standard bolus, p = 0.98]. Hypoglycemia occurred once 1.5 h post-meal during closed-loop with standard bolus. Overall insulin delivery was lower with reduced prandial boluses [61.9(55.2,75.0) vs 72.5(63.6,80.3)IU, p = 0.01] and resulted in lower mean plasma insulin concentration [186(171,260) vs 252(198,336)pmol/l, p = 0.002]. Lower plasma insulin was also documented overnight [160(136,192) vs 191(133,252)pmol/l,p = 0.01, pooled nights]. Ra_total was similar [26.3(21.9,28.0) vs 25.4(21.0,29.2)µmol/kg/min, p = 0.19] as well as Rd [25.8(21.0,26.9) vs 25.2(21.2,28.8)µmol/kg/min, p = 0.46]. Twenty five percent reduction of prandial boluses during closed-loop maintains comparable glucose control in adolescents with T1D whilst lowering overall plasma insulin levels. It remains unclear whether closed-loop therapy with 25% reduction of prandial boluses will prevent postprandial hypoglycemia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01629251.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 28 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 34%
Engineering 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#21,401,227
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#3,188
of 6,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,998
of 315,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
#38
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.