| Title |
Why do mammals hop? Understanding the ecology, biomechanics and evolution of bipedal hopping
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Biology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1242/jeb.161661 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Bipedal hopping is a specialized mode of locomotion that has arisen independently in at least five groups of mammals. We review the evolutionary origins of these groups, examine three of the most prominent hypotheses for why bipedal hopping may have arisen, and discuss how this unique mode of locomotion influences the behavior and ecology of modern species. While all bipedal hoppers share generally similar body plans, differences in underlying musculoskeletal anatomy influence what performance benefits each group may derive from this mode of locomotion. Based on a review of the literature, we conclude that the most likely reason that bipedal hopping evolved is associated with predator avoidance by relatively small species in forested environments. Yet, the morphological specializations associated with this mode of locomotion have facilitated the secondary acquisition of performance characteristics that enable these species to be highly successful in ecologically demanding environments such as deserts. We refute many long-held misunderstandings about the origins of bipedal hopping and identify potential areas of research that would advance the understanding of this mode of locomotion. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 15% |
| Australia | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 24 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 21 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 25% |
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |